![]() ![]() As I wrote, this is supposed to be fully customizable. But we'll definitely look into it.Ībout the "Originals" folder. This approach would be much better, but I'm not sure if that could be done. But there is some ideas about adjusting the nondeterministic filters in such way, that even those could be reproduced when the proper values are stored. This will still be presented as one version in digiKam. However, when you do some non-reproducible changes, like using some effect, which uses random values for initialization, we need to preserve this exact output, because it can't be reproduced in the same way (thanks for the randomness), so this gets saved again to the same file, but next edit you'll do, will need to go to new file. If there would be only the list of edits stored somewhere, you wouldn't be able to edit it with nothing else until you'd export it from digiKam. This is done for example for you to be able to edit the edited file with some external app, let's say GIMP. Next edit you do, is again applied to the same already-created version and the list of edits in metadata is updated. The non-destructive editing will be done in such way, that if (and only if) you do some edit to some image, there is automatically created new file, which is a copy of the original with applied changes and with list of edits you've made saved in metadata. ![]() According to your comments, I take it that there is some misunderstaning in the whole concept. Few days ago I blogged about the progress of non-destructive editing in digiKam. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |